- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy-deleted as a hoax JamesBWatson (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Link Starbureiy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD declined. Lacks any sort of reliable sourcing, and I wasn't able to find any. Fails WP:V, to say nothing of WP:N. RayTalk 05:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- RayTalk 05:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- RayTalk 05:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as silly hoax and ban creator. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Speedy delete WP:CSD#G3. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax. Nsk92 (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No reliable sources provided - they're all press releases/primary sources. I've searched, and I couldn't find any reliable third-party sources - only primary sources, social networking, blogs, etc, and it all just looks like made-up nonsense. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.