- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Liquid Image (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable band with no 3rd party references. Probably is CSD-able even, but author contested prod tag, so I'm going through this process to get consensus. Jaysweet (talk) 20:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non notable music band. Zenlax T C S 20:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete No sources, no assertion of notability, fails WP:MUSIC. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC - no inherent notability, no notable members, no awards, no charting, no reliable coverage in secondary/third party sources. Hits on google turn back myspace, official website, blogspot and other trivial mentions. Wisdom89 (T / C) 21:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, notability not asserted. – ukexpat (talk) 21:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I removed the speedy tag, but my only reason for doing so is that the article has been around for over a year, so I'd like to let the AfD process run its course. I doubt it will survive, but let it run through. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 05:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If I saw this while on Huggle, I would tag it with db-band. J.delanoygabsadds 23:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.