Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Emacs commands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 01:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Emacs commands

WP:NOT#MANUAL. A handful commands of thousands. Contested prod. Saber^Excalibur! 07:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Achromatic (talk) 07:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I was going to link to WP:NOT#HOWTO but nom already beat me to it :( Cumulus Clouds (talk) 07:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and other comments that WP is not a manual book. Suggest: move to wikisource. Dekisugi (talk) 12:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a guide.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
C-z Nothing that needs to be in an encyclopedia... -- RoninBK _{T C} 14:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice. -Verdatum (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete everyone here has the same justification, for good reason. -Verdatum (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I realize wikipedia is not a manual. However, as the nominator said, this is a handful of commands out of thousands. Thus it does not fit the description of a manual, nor an indiscriminate list. It is a helpful and useful page, which is why I created it. Perhaps it should be merged with emacs? Fresheneesz (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's indescriminate because it doesn't say which commands should be in this list and which should not. Therefore, with other contributors, this list could become complete; thousands of commands, serving no benefit, as the information is already found on other, more appropriate locations. The external links listed in the emacs article for example, are particularly good...including an emacs wiki :) -Verdatum (talk) 02:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not an encyclopedia article and no potential to become one. --Stormie (talk) 03:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.