Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ergo Proxy terms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 00:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ergo Proxy terms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The lead speaks for itself (WP:Plot). There is nothing in this list that is not already on Ergo Proxy that is important in the context of the anime. As such, it goes into insufficient detail, which occasionally steps in the area of fan speculation. « ₣M₣ » 03:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

• Merge or keep a glossary is useful in understanding whatever terms are used in the articles and episode lists. Though, doesn't Wiktionary allow appendices for fictional works? 70.51.8.75 (talk) 05:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- treelo _radda 09:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Selectively merge to wherever these terms are directly relevant (episode/chapter summaries, character list/pages, etc.) and then redirect to Ergo Proxy. If there is an Ergo Proxy wiki, transwiki there as well if it hasn't been done already. —Dinoguy1000 17:16, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm not seeing how these terms help enhances the understanding of the main articles. Most of it appears to be an excuses to include plot details and original research. --Farix (Talk) 12:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.