Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Games and Users from ReBoot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 07:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Games and Users from ReBoot

WP:NOT#IINFO. Excessive minutiae. Masaruemoto 00:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not using the F-word but it really does apply. JuJube 01:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sr13 (T|C) ^ER 06:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable information. Though JuJube, how does Featured Content apply here? Did you perhaps mean to link to WP:Fancruft? Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 17:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Whoops, I sure did. JuJube 04:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Dave101→talk→contributions • 17:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- Pax:Vobiscum 20:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just because it's true doesn't mean we should have an article about it. Pax:Vobiscum 20:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have no qualms about using it: pure, unadulterated fancruft! Coren 23:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DaveApter 16:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment Is it SNOWing? Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 15:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.