Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ibis the Invincible enemies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Ibis the Invincible#Enemies. A Redirect would not work here as this section is simply a link to this article. So, I'm closing this as a Merge. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ibis the Invincible enemies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is complete unsourced. The main article Ibis the Invincible is notable but Wikipedia implores us to not immediately split new articles if it would fail the general notability criteria and specific notability criteria for their topic. There is nothing to preserve, and for those who disagree, any fixes can occur at the main Ibis the Invincible article. Jontesta (talk) 17:59, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 17:59, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Lists. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:17, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Completely unsourced list that is almost entirely made up of minor, one-shot characters. Searches are not showing any kind of sources that would support or justify a spinout character list, let alone a specific enemies list, for Ibis. Rorshacma (talk) 06:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with the enemies section of Ibis the Invincible in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. --Rtkat3 (talk) 23:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect per Rorshacma. Can't find the types of sources that would justify one, let alone multiple character lists. Redirect is a valid WP:ATD, or even a selective merge per Rtkat3. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.