Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Māori language television channels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 00:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Māori language television channels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. There is unlikely to be very many additions to the list. The contents are best to be placed at Māori language. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep per WP:SK #1: "fails to advance an argument for deletion — perhaps only proposing a non-deletion action such as moving or merging". Warden (talk) 09:56, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into a section at Māori language. Then page can be deleted. Polyamorph (talk) 10:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A list with only two possible items is hardly a list. Both items are mentioned in the Māori Television article so no need to merge. Although Maori television could be incorporated better into the Te Reo (TV channel) article. AIRcorn (talk) 10:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge to Māori language. This stub is a short pointless list that will never expand. Even a merge is unnecessary given that both channels in this "list" (only two channels) are already discussed in the Māori language article. Deterence ^Talk 06:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge as above. If at some point in the future it becomes sufficiently substantial to justify an article on its own then that can be created. At present that is not justified. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 09:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.