Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Meteos planets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Meteos planets

It either needs to be completely redone or, IMHO, deleted. It's nonstop opinion throughout {"very strange", "it's great", "sounds like", etc.) and reads very much like it's been cut and pasted from somewhere else. The statistics almost certainly were, and are therefore a copyright violation. Crabapplecove 02:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would have tagged it with {{move to gaming wiki}} if I have seen that article lately. The information does not fit Wikipedia, the simple list of planets could go in Meteos, while all the extra information may go to a gaming wiki. -- ReyBrujo 02:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, Move to gaming wiki per ReyBrujo. There is no need to delete potentially useful infomation, just put it in the right place! —— Eagle (ask me for help) 04:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to main article then rewrite and condense. Noting some of the wilder characteristics (such as for Gravitas or Hevendor) would be useful for the main Meteos article, but comprehensive stats are things for a gaming wiki (or Wikibooks?), especially when the game itself mentions nothing about these stats and they can only be derived experientially. --Stratadrake 09:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (With move to a gaming wiki if any want it) I wouldn't call using statistics a copyvio, they're simple facts that can't be written any other way. That being said... simple stats about video game levels pretty much violate NOT a game guide, as do the personal opinions and suggestions. I don't really see any need to merge - there doesn't seem to be any info that would be useful, except in a guide sort of way. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 20:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Move to Wikibooks. I did contribute to this article, but let's be honest- it's more appropriate for a strategy guide than an encyclopedia, and a strategy guide is what Wikipedia is not. --Sonicrazy 02:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC) [reply]

~~Wikibooks does not accept game guides anymore. -- ReyBrujo 03:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]
On second thought, delete it. It has nowhere to go, and I've stopped working on it anyway. --Sonicrazy 14:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Crabapplecove, sans the copy vios.SuperDT 07:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.