Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Music Genome Project attributes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Music Genome Project attributes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Verifiability. See also point 3 of Wikipedia:IINFO#IINFO: "Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles. In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader." See also points #4, #7, #8, #10, and #11 of the WP:LISTCRUFT essay. WCityMike (talk) 21:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One of the main problems is that the MGP declines to release the list of attributes -- they consider it a trade secret. Thus, the attributes are gained by looking at the attributes for particular songs as they are playing. It's not really a suitable project for Wikipedia; Wikisource might like it maybe? But it's still an original list. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:44, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While somewhat interesting, it is not based on secondary sources discussing these attributes but pretty much copied from the primary source. So not notable by WP standards. Kitfoxxe (talk) 22:31, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm personally fond of this list, but there are absolutely no secondary sources discussing the attributes, nothing on how they're determined, so on and so forth. As interesting as the list is, there's nothing to suggest notability. ~Cheers, Ten TonParasol 23:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.