Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of QRP Transceivers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of amateur radio transceivers. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of QRP Transceivers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

List of QRP Transceivers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The list is for very specific type of amateur radio stuff. My primary concern is that many of them are very low volume products citing e-commerce portals and it seems to serve the purpose of hosting a "product catalog" as a doorway for customer traffic for commercial purposes. Graywalls (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTCATALOGUE, none of these are notable and sources are primary only without passing LISTN. Reywas92^Talk 19:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral for now. --mikeu ^talk 02:38, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of amateur radio transceivers is a bit of a mess, however merge and redirect there seems like the best outcome. --mikeu ^talk 16:39, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or simply Redirect to List of amateur radio transceivers, merging any useful content. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect would seem the way to go, but how to show notability of a piece of kit? No comment on the CEO mumbo jumbo. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 21:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

comment What we use around here is general notability. An instructor could be notable within an institution, a custom tool notable within a niche community, so on without being generally notable. When there is lack of general notability, there is no notability to "show". Wikipedia isn't the right place for hosting a list of vanity kits put together by some guy who is selling them out of his garage. Graywalls (talk) 01:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Ajf773 (talk) 23:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect into List of amateur radio transceivers, there is information of this page that is notable enough to be listed on that page. The whole amateur radio transceiver category of WP is being worked on currently (by me), so deletion of content that should be at least partly merged should not happen. Initramfs (talk) 13:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.