Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of SamTrans bus lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen (talk) 02:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of SamTrans bus lines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates WP:NOT#INFO, just a list of non-notable bus routes. Delete Secret ^account 22:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Like List of bus routes in London and many others like it, it's a perfectly valid list of bus lines in a major metropolitan area. The list is not indiscriminate and specific to one system. My only suggestion would be to rename List of SamTrans bus routes. --Oakshade (talk) 01:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It's a valid list and there are similar lists for many other bus routes. The only alternative would be to put it all into SamTrans, and I think that article would be overwhelmed by a listing of all the bus routes; better to have it in a separate article with a referral, as is done now. I agree with Oakshade's suggested rename. --MelanieN (talk) 03:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per out usual outcomes here. Bearian (talk) 20:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:SIZE. Merging this into the article on the system would overwhelm that page. Sebwite (talk) 22:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.