Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Trek: Enterprise introduction images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Star Trek: Enterprise introduction images

Non-encyclopedic content/excessive detail - Move offsite to Memory Alpha? MrZaius^talk 05:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fan and List cruft. Phasers on high power </bad joke> --Whs itc hy 05:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Damn, beaten to the punch. Transport it into deep space. I like Star Trek as much as the next sentient entity, but this is just way too trivial. Clarityfiend 05:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to MA and delete. Too crufty for Wikipedia. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 06:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Transwiki move mostly complete: [1]. Just needs a little link cleanup over there. MrZaius^talk 06:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated comment: Apparently they use a CC license, incompatible with the GFDL. Move flagged over there as copyvio & deleted. Is there any point in keeping this on another Wikimedia site, or should it just cease to exist? MrZaius^talk 06:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response comment HAH! even they don't want it. Shall we throw tribbles at them as well? (sorry, I'm being sarcastic tonight) --Whs itc hy 07:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. *** Crotalus *** 16:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:FICT, if these were notable, somehow they'd have made their way into the gajillions of Star Trek articles we already have. Carlossuarez46 23:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I love this list and the content in it, but even I cannot see the logic such a trivial list. The fact that I personally like it aside, a much better version (including frame grabs and per-second sequence) is available at http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/features/documentaries/article/3686.html . LaughingVulcan ^{Laugh With Me /} ^{Logical Entries} 02:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Does it snow in space? --Whs itc hy 02:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response comment No. MrZaius^talk 03:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No snow in space, but bits of floating ice. Does that count? Oh, and the list goes against WP:NOT. --Kyoko 03:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the commenters above, this page is being used as a repository for trivia. Yamaguchi先生 07:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (or merge per WP:NOTABLE#Notability guidelines do not directly limit article content). If not; please make sure it is accessible from somewhere else. --Bensin 22:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Merge the entire article, or a 2-5 sentence more basic summary in Star Trek: Enterprise? Can't really see a place for the entire article, given the way it would overwhelm a preexisting article, barring a move offsite. MrZaius^talk 23:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.