Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Wars clone trooper commanders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 21:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Star Wars clone trooper commanders

Similar to the rationales at List of Star Wars clone trooper legions: a list of non-notable make-believe clones. One citation to a reliable sources and entirely in-universe. The Cody figure might be worth mentioning somewhere on Wikipedia for the dramatic effect of his order to fire on Kenobi -- but it's not done any service here. EEMeltonIV 22:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Send out the clones. Not notable. Realkyhick 03:18, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Cloning a notable character does not make the clone notable (See WP:CLONE). ~ Infrangible 16:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Slavlin 17:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why delete it? These are (presumably) existing characters in a widely-known milieu. The clones being given specific names makes them notable, given the nature of cloning within the Star Wars universe. Wikipedia contains numerous lists from other fictional milieu, such as Borg starships, List of Pokémon characters, Geography of Xanth, Minor characters in 24, etc. IMHO, all of these are legitimate articles. --greenmoss 00:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hrm... I just read the "legions" discussion referenced above. Moving to Wookieepedia seems like a good middle ground if it is decided that this article should be deleted. However, I still feel that this list is on par with the other lists that I mentioned above. So if this list should be deleted, would it not be logical to delete all such lists? --greenmoss 00:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - getting a name may give them in-universe notability, but that doesn't translate into out-of-universe Wikipedia notability. Yes, there are many List of... amalgamations that should be deleted. --EEMeltonIV 00:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Clearly WP:NN. --Evb-wiki 17:01, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.