Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ancient reenactment groups (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 07:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of ancient reenactment groups

WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#LINK - The same reasons that the similar articles were deleted: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of medieval reenactment groups and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of modern reenactment groups. This is just a list of external links for these various groups. This was nominated for deletion in 2005, but it looked like this, so that doesn't have much relevance here. Masaruemoto 00:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I find it hard to imagine keeping it in 05, but such must have been the standards of the time. It is much better now. It is not just a collection of links, because it gives descriptions. DGG 03:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.While the organizations listed may not be "notable", "notability" is not a criteria for content, but for articles.Nucleophilic 00:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a directory or a collection of external links. This list of links does give descriptions, such as "our operational base is in Cork city. We aim to as accurately as possible show how a Roman soldier looked", and "We are interested in recreating the life and times of all Celtic people", so it looks like this list is only here to promote these non-notable groups, which is another good reason to delete it. Croxley 05:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete If the lists for other periods have gone, it would be inconsistent to keep this one. It does seem a pity, such a resource could be genuinely useful to readers. Gaius Cornelius 16:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP != YP. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- Pax:Vobiscum 20:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.