Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of channels on RCS&RDS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:55, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of channels on RCS&RDS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:LISTCRUFT, and no context Bazonka (talk) 19:48, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - first, it doesn't meet the definition of listcruft, as the list is specific and discriminate. That is, it is the list of channels of RCS&RDS (a cable provider in Romania). The channels the company covers is a valid part of its article, as this is one of the things people most want to know (and sources provide). Since the list is very large, it is better as a stand-alone list rather than a part of the company's article and thus should be kept as is. (However, a sentence of context should probably be added, which I'll do now.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 03:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions}* 07:56, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU ^tp* 15:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.