Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of collaborative software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Davewild 12:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of collaborative software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Indiscriminate list with no clear threshold for inclusion. ?Original research and doesn't seem encyclopaedic Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The concept of collaborative software is not original research. Given the descriptions and comparisons on the page, I think this article is highly encyclopedic and useful. I think more references could be added, however. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 00:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I don't see how this is somehow original research, given that the article is encyclopedic. Per Steve above, references could be added, but even the exclusion of that doesn't warrant a total page deletion. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• keep An encyclopedic list and lists are acceptable articles in WP. Certainly not an indiscriminate collection as the inclusion criteria is exactly stated. Does the article need improvement? Of course. So improve it. Hmains (talk) 04:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There are a lot of lists on Wikipedia. I happen to find this one, along with others, pretty useful. -Christopher Kraus 02:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.