Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of decision software
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- List of decision software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A list with external links only. No evidence of notability. Possibly spam for one supplier. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#PROMO, pure spam.--70.80.234.163 (talk) 16:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 23:47, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as above; no reliable sources; linkfarm of spam external links. Dialectric (talk) 16:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not meet the general notability guideline. Dzlife (talk) 13:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.