Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of free Go programs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of free Go programs

This is a list of external links which violates "Wikipedia's purpose is not to include a comprehensive list of external links related to each topic." in WP:EL Anshuk (talk) 02:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 02:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom. It probably could have made WP:CSD#A3. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 02:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:SPAM. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete as spam. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 08:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Lifebaka. It's a list, and offers little (if anything) else. At a stretch, it could indeed have made WP:CSD#A3. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 17:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any notable examples with the main article on the game -- as providing readers with some resources for playing the game is useful and violates no rule -- and delete the rest and any that are considered commercial ventures (some of these are open source so aren't revenue-generators). 23skidoo (talk) 03:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It is obvious some of you don't know what spam is. Spam is advertisement posing as legit external links, or is the bulk pasting of links to more places than is appropriate. While i'm not arguing for this article's keep - this list is not spam in any shape or form - it is simply a list of closely related links. Don't label it as something its not - I find doing so quite dishonorable. Fresheneesz (talk) 19:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Rray (talk) 23:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.