Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of irregular verbs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 21:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. There is already a decent Wiktionary entry for this. Delete. Kusma (討論) 18:10, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not a dictionary, nor an indescriminate collection of information. - squibix 18:17, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Josh Parris#: 00:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not a dictionary type entry and not indiscriminate. Calsicol 01:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It not only is a dictionary, the link to where Wiktionary has a better article than this was given above. Uncle G 01:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The article comprises just a list of words in (not quite) alphabetical order. There's no actual encyclopaedia article here at all. The article is a very bad dictionary, plain and simple. Irregular verb already links to Wiktionary doing this better, and has done so since November 2004. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Delete. Uncle G 01:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per Uncle G. Proto t c 12:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per Uncle G. Stifle 21:08, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.