Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of palindrome years

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:21, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This list contains nothing but the palindrome years from 909 to 2992. By nature, this is incomplete; it's also unsuited to any purpose. Pilatus 02:48, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I have no idea why anyone would ever need this article, ever. --Explodicle 03:11, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. Delete, no conceivable use to anyone. —Cryptic (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• DeleteteleD --howcheng [ talk • contribs • web ] 17:01, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Useless list - incomplete, and pointless to anyone who knows the definitions of "palindrome" and "year". flowersofnight 17:03, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per flowersofnight.--Isotope23 17:40, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete--pgk^(talk) 18:17, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete People could think this up on their ownMolotov (talk)
  19:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I generally like lists, but this is just ridiculous. --Jacquelyn Marie 19:50, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN hilarious! Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 21:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gee it did not make me laugh. To each their own. Molotov (talk)
    22:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete You would have to ride the short bus to need this listcruft. Funny in its own way, though. Youngamerican 02:34, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nominator --TimPope 20:39, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Pointless list. --OorWullie 08:41, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.