Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of progcore bands
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- List of progcore bands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Misleading list of bands. Of the bands listed not a single one uses the word "progcore" to describe its genre. roleplayer 18:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not a recognized musical sub-genre. Carrite (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lists must have clear criteria for membership. There's no criteria listed and not even an article progcore. Is progcore real? Is it notable? I think not. What does it mean? Who knows. (progcore was A7 deleted.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The musical genre is a made up neologism whose own article was already deleted. There's no real point in an article containing a list of bands in a made up genre. Rorshacma (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.