- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted ~ Riana ⁂ 19:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of stuff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
It is a list of "stuff," that links to completely random articles in alphabetical order. Domthedude001 17:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:RandomStuffIsGood Flobert 17:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; just sheer nonsense, should probably have been speedied. Accounting4Taste 17:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete what a pile of crap. Completely useless list with no encyclopedic value whatsoever. Hut 8.5 17:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for making me LOL. Seriously though, delete, but mention at the bad jokes page. Lugnuts 17:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Lol, why remove it? Keep Cheezychick 17:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Not in the same league as the Upper peninsular war, otherwise, as it says, just random stuff. Acroterion (talk) 18:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Seriously, I think that a list of stuff would be very helpful to many people who look at Wikipedia. Arogi Ho 18:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Completely useless list with no encyclopedic value whatsoever. Keep BabbageCabbage 18:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, if nothing else, it is a very interesting collection of stuff. 96T 18:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and replace every other article with a redirect to it. Oh all right then, reluctant delete. — iridescent (talk to me!) 18:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Very useful, very interesting, all notable things, not an indiscriminate list, no original research, no POV, no copyright violation, contains no statistics, author has done a lot of hard work, does not duplicate other list, other crap does not exist, and it is, should be a wikiproject. As it says, a list of stuff, but not just any stuff, though, because every single one of these things gets 100+ hits on google. Plus, Andy Rooney has done a pointless essay about every one of these things. Mandsford 18:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep why should we delete it; It's an indiscriminate collection of info--Phoenix 15 18:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC) (joke)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOT#INFO. This would fall under statistics. Or maybe WP:NOT#STUPID. - ђαίгснгм таιќ 19:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.