Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of websites with a high PageRank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 01:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NOT "Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links..." PageRank can fluctuate, sites can appear/disappear... and is it really our job to list these sites? Will it matter in 5-10 years what site was a pagerank 9 or 10 in 2006? While I grant Google certainly requires an article, and Pagerank itself requires an article... do we really need this list?  ALKIVAR™ 13:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom. This is pretty much a set of links to websites. Wickethewok 14:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. PJM 14:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete. per nom. The premise is flawed anyway. PR is per page, not per site. Fiddle Faddle 15:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above. --AlexDW 17:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Super duper uber strong delete This article is ludicrous. 'Nuff said. -- Kicking222 21:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, unmaintainable list. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 22:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: WP:WING –Dicty (T/C) 22:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Coredesat. Ridiculous list. GassyGuy 23:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, indiscriminate list, incompletable, original research. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-07-04 01:55Z
• Keep (strong) - this list is interesting and might be usefull. There are such lists at the Wikipedia like Fortune companies, big computer companies, etc. --Oldadamml 17:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I like information. even incomplete information.
• Keep - I find this page very useful. 69.181.148.33 23:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.