Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of weapons in video games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 10:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of weapons in video games

This is just Listcruft. I could stop tehre and that would be sufficient reason to delete but I would think it would be a good idea if we were to stop and think of every video/internet game and think of all thir weapons. How long will the article be? Longest Article on Wikipedia by far. J.J.Sagnella 09:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If this were to be completed I can't imagine how line it would have to be. If you want to find out about game weaponary check the individual articles; they can go into much better detail. Whilding87 09:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It's going to be nigh impossible to compile a list of every weapon used in every game ever- do you count video games from ten years ago? Fifteen years ago? Will there be descriptions for each weapon, drawing out the potential length of this list to high heaven? Simply put, there are snowballs in hell that have a better chance of staying cold than this article has being maintainable. TheLetterM 09:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is the worst kind of listcruft - it could go on forever. Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 11:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this list is just going to go on forever and I can't see any use for it. Hut 8.5 12:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pavel Vozenilek 13:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Talk about your unmaintainable lists. --UsaSatsui 16:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A truly bad idea. Entirely unmaintainable. --- RockMFR 18:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Listcruft is the worst possible reason for deletion as it says little or nothing (see Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words) except WP:IDONTLIKEIT. That said, delete as unmaintainable and not particularly informative in its current state (and possibly in any future state as well). -- Black Falcon 19:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is unmaintainable listcruft at its worst. This is an indiscriminate collection of information, of little to no use at all. NetOracle 21:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the editor(s) merely started of this list the wrong way. Doesn't mean that conceptually the article couldn't exist. Mathmo ^Talk 16:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TheLetterM. -- Hawaiian717 05:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.