Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Shepherd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 21:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Little Shepherd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of notability DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The film appears to be based on the 1951 book Little Shepherd by Anobel Armour. Google does not show whether or not the book is notable, but if its notability can be established, I would be okay with mentioning this film in an article re-tailored to be about the book. If nothing can be found, I am fine with deleting the article. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Having just spent some time with the article fixing it per per MOS:FILM, I agree... this short film fails WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.