- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirected on 21 February 2008 per [1]. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 19:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dictionary article; no references; exists since Oct. 2007 and no substantial improvements since then. Lea (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unsourced dicdef neologism that could never be expanded.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 19:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It certainly is a dicdef now, but I have doubts about the 'could never be expanded' part. Given that it is a rather common term I'd merge for now to Blog#Types.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 04:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Blog#Types. Tikiwont's logic matches mine. -Verdatum (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.