- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. henrik•talk 23:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This game is not very important for an encylcopedia, so please delete it. - Drafting Steve
- Keep. A reasonably famous game; Jeff Minter is a notable game designer and all that, and being a commercially released game, it's probably covered in several game magazines of the era, so I don't think this gets glitched on verifiability. I'd like to hear some more elaboration on why this game isn't "very important for an encyclopaedia". --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 22:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 22:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep nominator has put forward no reason for deletion. User:Krator (t c) 23:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The nominator put forward "non-notability", just no phrased as such. --Paularblaster (talk) 23:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable company, notable writer, notable game. Added a few links to the article, but there is tons of material. Probably needs a bit of a rewrite though. ELIMINATORJR 23:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.