Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Stephens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments for this article's inclusion have been made in over 21 days. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Stephens

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I really don't want to do this, but I have been looking through several pages of Google results for various keyword permutations with very little coming up to show notability. Lots of copies of this bio/Wiki mirrors, and plenty of hits for various other Lloyd Stephens. I have confirmed that he exists, and I REALLY want to see that he is notable, but basically, this is an unreferenced BLP and I can't find any sources that appear to pass reliability guidelines, hence bringing this for discussion. Mabalu (talk) 01:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment/addenda - The reason I want him to turn out to be notable is that he is a deaf comedian, and I think we need more coverage of notably disabled people on here, particularly those who have succeeded despite the challenges of their disability. But if the sources don't exist... Am surprised we don't have a delsort category for disability/different ability topics, btw. Mabalu (talk) 13:27, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.