- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Lo-Down (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All "Lo-Down" Google hits that I found are for a website, not a band. Thus, this article appears to fail the general notability guideline, and it also fails WP:BAND. Additionally, the article itself begins with "Little is known about Lo-Down, other than..." Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - So little is known of them that I could not find any reliable sources writing about them to establish notability. --- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.