Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loc'd Life Magazine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 17:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Loc'd Life Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
New magainze with virtually no independent coverage (outside of forums). Therefore, does not appear to be notable. I wasn't sure if a magazine with a print component fell under scope of A7, hence the nomination. Singularity42 (talk) 22:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonnotable per WP:WEB and WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: The article's author put his comments at the article's talk page instead of this discussion. I have replied and asked him to join in the discussion at this page. Singularity42 (talk) 23:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this magazine. Joe Chill (talk) 01:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.