Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locomotion Tango

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 05:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Locomotion Tango

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded and prod removed by article creator with the comment, "was it a charting song? https://books.google.cl/books?id=YyEUAQAAIAAJ." Link is a deadlink. "Solitary reference merely confirms the song exists and contradicts the label information… still no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG which also reads “Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album” and WP:GNG. Richhoncho (talk) 09:20, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- fails WP:NSONG Flat Out (talk) 02:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can find nothing that suggests the single meets WP:NSONGS. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per arguments of Sam Sailor and Flat Out. The article can be crated again if notability can be established, but right now there is no indication of that. —Sietecolores (talk) 13:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sufficient claim for notability - and I tried. Collect (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.