- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted as a blatant advertisement. Jamie☆S93 18:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Logic Voice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Blatant advert. The author, who is the company's chairman, could not even be bothered to write an encyclopedia article. Instead he submits an OTRS ticket to allow him to copy his own website. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as spam. Copyvio was the fastest way to get this off, but it wasn't the only issue. I'll repeat my talk page comments, which I wrote as the AfD was being done: This is the height of lazy self-promotion. They can't be bothered to re-write a page that desperately needs re-writing (its =/= it's, for starters). This still looks like a spam speedy delete candidate, now that the copyvio issues are out of the way. Can't wikipedia refuse an offer of copyrighted material? Because this text is junk. Hairhorn (talk) 17:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- G11 Spammy spam is spammy. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete advert -- Rmzadeh ► 18:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.