- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Joyous! Noise! 20:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- LoginRadius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. References do not meet WP:ORGCRIT and I was unable to find anything better in a WP:BEFORE search. CNMall41 (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CNMall41 (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - Was thinking of simply redirecting this to founder Deepak Gupta (researcher) but I have concerns with notability of that page as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - coverage that exists is either not in-depth, not independent, or not reliable. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NBUSINESS that I can find. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.