Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitech Illuminated Keyboard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Logitech#Products. (non-admin closure) Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Logitech Illuminated Keyboard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 10:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:Per [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], and [14]. Joe Chill (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
merge as appropriate to the company. The present article is a mere advertisement. Normally reviews make a product notable, but for something a trivial as this there is no reason to have an article. notability is required for an article, but it can still be better to merge. DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge – To Product List at Logitech. As DGG pointed out “…article is a mere advertisement.” for a particular company’s product. As such, it gives undue weight to that particular company’s product line with regards to illuminated keyboards, which have become standard with other manufacturers of similar items. Almost like we our giving a Good Housekeeping Seal to the item, if allowed to have a standalone piece. There is nothing notable or unseal about this particular keyboard that makes it stand-out more than any other manufacturers keyboard, as such, does not deserve a special place here at Wikipedia. Happy New Year. JAAG^Talk 16:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per DGG. Peridon (talk) 19:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Logitech and trim out the peacock words. TomCat4680 (talk) 03:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable product.Jack007 (talk) 19:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.