- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splashtalk 00:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page was created by a user who later turned out to be a vandal. As such, it is being nominated for Afd as a possible hoax. However, I haven't had time to research it and it may possibly be a valid article. -- Curps 16:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the creator's contributions record, I approached with extreme scepticism. However, it googles nicely (look at this). I have removed the stuff I can't verify (Clarkson and the name's derivation) which admittedly doesn't leave much, but I vote keep as it stands. --RobertG ♬ talk 17:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep needs expansion but very definitely a real place --Deiz 12:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per Deiz :: Supergolden 22:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Real place, and here's a source if anyone wants to expand the article: http://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/longformacus/longformacus/ Thanks/wangi 09:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep place I know, and I have visited a number of times. Why is it a "hoax"? Because Scottish place names sound odd to some people's ears? --MacRusgail 11:17, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I've corrected and expanded the article a bit, and removed the AfD notice since this is really a speedy keep. Thanks/wangi 11:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Real, verifiable, expanding as we speak and Wangi beat me to it with the Geograph image which I will now delete from my HD :-) Cactus.man ✍ 19:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.