- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 15:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable per WP:MUSIC Nv8200p talk 02:38, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 11:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Writeups of the band cited in the article, such as theprp.com and loudside.com are not "non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media". No other claim to notability. Kimchi.sg 12:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, in the midst of a national tour. Nominator is incorrect, national tours mean notable per WP:MUSIC. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 13:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep, found this Decibel magazine article, an actual paper magazine. It's just barely beyond blurb, though. --Dhartung | Talk 17:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NMG. Stifle (talk) 13:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:NMG. This band qualifies as notability in MUSIC category per national touring, writeups in notable publications, and regular rotation on national radio. sausagefence 2:57, 9 May 2006.
- Keep This band clearly meets WP:NMG notability by the three aforementioned criteria as well as containing a member of another notable band as well. Sounds like the person who flagged it is out of touch with notable underground bands. --user:fragmented8 22:18 9 May 2006.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.