Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loop (2012 Short Film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 12:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Loop (2012 Short Film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, unreleased short film made by an amateur filmmaker with no indications of notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A short that didn't win an inter-college competition and was released on youtube doesn't quite make the grade. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The short hasn't received any real coverage in RS that would show that this is notable. What I can find proves that it exists, but existing is not notability.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I apologize for having unintentionally violated any Wikipedia policy by creating this article. I realize that the short hasn't received any coverage at all. I am a new member at Wikipedia (though have been reading articles here for a long time) and was not aware that a page without references cannot survive in Wikipedia at all. I've added a link to the whole movie as a reference. Is there anything else I can do to save this article from deletion? Or does its deletion seem imminent?.KrazzyDJ (talk) 22:50, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gene93k. The best way to prevent deletion is to read WP:NF, the guideline on the notability of films, to see what is needed for notability. The best case is to find independent coverage in media: a review by a news source, an interview about the film, etc, and then provide the source (url or otherwise). BOVINEBOY2008 20:21, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~. Given the high constraints under which I made this movie, I believe getting it some sort of coverage is going to be a difficult task. Nevertheless, I'm trying my best to post my movie at different websites with the hope that I could possible get a few of them to take notice and result in my movie getting some coverage. Let's say that it doesn't get any coverage at this moment but manages to secure some coverage in the near future (highly improbable but just assuming it does). And let's say in the meanwhile my page is deleted. Can I then recreate this page again without violating any Wikipedia policies? KrazzyDJ (talk) 03:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It is possible for it to be userfied. And note that the coverage needs to be third party coverage. You should also be aware of your obvious conflict of interest and how best to hand that. BOVINEBOY2008 22:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails GNG and SNG for films. Cavarrone (talk) 07:28, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.