Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loose Connection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Loose Connection

Although I think that Loose Connection is an excellent service, I don't see why it merits an article. It's just a small provider, supplying wi-fi to just 19 places. It may possibly be the biggest individual supplier of wi-fi in Brighton & Hove (difficult to tell) but from personal knowledge I can state that the majority of places that provide wi-fi here don't use Loose Connection. Thus there is nothing particularly significant about the organisation. Also, I can't find non-trivial external references. (Some of the external references I can find by Googling were actually written by myself!) A bit iffy (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —A bit iffy (talk) 14:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —A bit iffy (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —A bit iffy (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet WP:CORP. A listing of the individual hot spots doesn't help here. Orphaned articles are usually orphaned for a reason. Note: not to be confused with Loose Connection, a notable jazz combo of the 1970s. B.Wind (talk) 04:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An "excellent service" does not mean it needs an article in an encyclopaedia. A little mum-and-pop Wi-Fi shop doesn't meet WP:CORP. MvjsTalking 06:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.