- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete & disambiguation page too, since it is no longer needed. (aeropagitica) 23:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Self-promotion. Supporting links are all to subject's own website. Googling "Lord Capulet" + "International Idiocy" gets 5 matches, of which 2 are Wikipedia. FreplySpang (talk) 04:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note If this is deleted or redirected, need to also remove Lord Capulet (disambiguation) which links to this page or Romeo and Juliet. Fan1967 05:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. dbtfztalk 04:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Capulet. (Second choice: Delete) —BorgHunter
ubx(talk) 04:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] - Delete Non-notable blogger. Fails WP:WEB. Fan1967 04:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per BorgHunter. Note: the International Idiocy tag means this is part of the User:Chaz365 series of vanispamcruft articles. Alba 04:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Actually, it isn't! (Surprised me too) This has been around for a while, and as far as I know Chaz365 just started up today. FreplySpang (talk) 05:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Woah, what's going on here? This article has been around for a long time, why the sudden change of heart? - VanillaX 05:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Nobody noticed it before now. Doesn't mean it deserves to stay. Fan1967 05:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete just add my voice to this one. All the User:Chaz365 articles seem to be unnoteable self-promotion. Palnu 05:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as notnotable. What? He campaigned in online forums? If everyone who did that was notable, then we would have to rethink the whole premise of wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Bobby1011 05:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn. --Terence Ong 05:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable and optionally recreate as redirect to Capulet. --Kinu t/c 07:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, get rid of the wholly unnecessary Lord Capulet (disambiguation). --Kinu t/c 19:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. --kingboyk 07:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as above. ProhibitOnions 11:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. FCYTravis 22:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete not notable. Newyorktimescrossword 07:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable vanity. Ifnord 16:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.