Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorem Ipsum Books

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lorem Ipsum Books

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP - This is the best source I can find, but even this is some way off what we need for the shop to have an article here. SmartSE (talk) 21:28, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's just a small, one-___location bookstore. Google News found only passing mentions and press releases. --MelanieN (talk) 01:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 03:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 00:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconoclast.horizon (talk • contribs) 05:18, August 24, 2012‎
Delete - seems to be a pretty unremarkable shop. (This should really have been closed as 'delete' already.) Robofish (talk) 20:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.