Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loretta Basey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Loretta Basey

Loretta Basey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Derived notability only, from her successive fiancés, DGG ( talk ) 14:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG WP:NMODEL like the large number of glamour models out there and because she had minor note for datign a celebrity, WP:NOTINHERITED. Donnie Park (talk) 08:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED - Dating celebs doesn't make you notable period, That aside there's no evidence of notability anyway, Fails NMODEL, NOTINHERITED and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails GNG and NMODEL. Insufficient indicia of notability. Montanabw^(talk) 05:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Presently this person does not satisfy GNG and NMODEL criteria. --Dcirovic (talk) 11:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.