Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke's Quest: Prisoner of Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Luke's Quest: Prisoner of Time (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam for non-notable self-published book by non-notables. Orange Mike | Talk 08:17, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No reviews, nothing... Publisher's website tells you that you can publish your own paperback/hardback for less than 600 bucks. --Crusio (talk) 10:47, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Crusio. This is a hopeless case. I would have let the prod stand, quite frankly. Reyk _YO! 01:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete probably could have been speedy deleted as spam. Nothing notable about book. It appears to be a vanity publishing project.Shsilver (talk) 16:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.