Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luna-C Productions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete per everyone and owner's emailed request. - CrazyRussian talk/email 00:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No vote procedural nomination. Article was previously three times speedied and recreate-protected as a {{db-group}}, but the author persevered and convinced me to give s/him a change at AfD. So I did. Author basicall admits on my talk page to being part of the troupe, so this has a vanity aspect to it. Beyond that, it would be nice to have things like newspaper coverage etc. to assess notability. I hope the author can provide that over the next five days. - CrazyRussian talk/email 03:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral pending info from creaotr. ~Chris (talk/e@) 04:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Speedy delete per below.. ~Chris (talk/e@) 18:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Speedy delete per CSD-A7, no assertion of notability, nothing on Google or Yahoo that establishes any. --Coredesat talk 04:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per Coredesat. No google news hits, < 65 google hits and only 6 with them in the title. CrazyRussian is being fair but this has no chance of being notable --Peripitus (Talk) 05:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Teeth-achingly non-notable. The highpoints of the members' bios almost look like parodies. --Calton | Talk 05:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete with kudos to CrazyRussian for being patient and transparent. Ifnord 19:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I removed CSD template. Author has yet to post his opinion, but he's about to per his emails. Give him a chance to show notability at least. - CrazyRussian talk/email 22:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "Notable accomplishments of cast members" Individuals being notable does not mean the group is notable. --Pboyd04 23:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.