Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyle Stevik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (drawl) @ 18:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lyle Stevik

Lyle Stevik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite national attention, no indication of lasting importance. DGG ( talk ) 01:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  01:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  01:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  01:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  01:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the WP:Victim and WP:ONEEVENT notability guidelines, the crime (suicide, which technically is, as it is against the law) was unusual, as the perpetrator/victim remains unidentified, which is no ordinary occasion. National attention, as sources indicate, also makes him notable. --GouramiWatcher^(?) 02:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -WP:Victim & WP:ONEEVENT.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per VICTIM & ONEEVENT. --–Davey2010^Talk 17:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Pile on the keepwagon - per above. WP:VICTIM and WP:ONEEVENT suffice to have this article included. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 21:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.