Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyricus Teaching Order

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 22:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lyricus Teaching Order (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

If ever I saw an "indiscernible or unclassifiable topic", this is it. I've read this very carefully multiple times. I've also read it's "parent" article, and attempted to make sense of the single alleged reference. Having done so, I am no closer to understanding what on earth this article is about, and exactly why it warrants a Wikipedia page. From what I can make out, it appears to be an element of some kind on wannabe-Scientology website, or possibly part of a particularly odd hoax (nothing seems quite clear as to exactly what this is). Whatever it is, I don't see why we need a page on it and see no possible way to expand it.  – iridescent 15:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not a hoax, however, it is not notable either. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Either redirect to Wingmakers if that is a legitimate topic, or delete as non-notable. Whatever this is, it is a part of Wingmakers and should be covered in that article, if at all. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   jj137 (talk) 18:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm 100% with Iridescent on this, including the total confusion.
  Delete as failing WP:NOTE, lacking reliable sources covering it. Usually I would suggest merging the information into Wingmakers, but that one doesn't appear to be any more notable or coherent, for that matter.
  This could have been a group nomination with Wingmakers and Event Temples I think. --Amalthea^Talk 21:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.