- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- M&M Proyectos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Orphaned since 2007, no reliable sources, some claims of notability but nothing which proves it, notability is not inherited. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 02:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indicaiton of wp:notability. The two "references" aren't references. 90% of the article 'content" is just vague promotional doublespeak. North8000 (talk) 02:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.