Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M&N Aviation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

M&N Aviation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

M&N Aviation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Article is on a regional airline that operates six small executive jets. It has one RS in article, which contains a one-sentence mention. A WP:BEFORE on Google News, Google Books, JSTOR, and newspapers.com, finds two additional references, neither of which are RS. Chetsford (talk) 06:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete. To be fair, I wouldn't call the company's Falcon 900EX a "small executive jet". However, I'm not seeing much in the way of independent news coverage sufficient to meet WP:GNG. There's an article on ainonline.com, "Caribbean Charter Providers Team Up" on March 9, 2020 [1] that seems to come close, but reads like a direct publication of a press release and that's just one article, not multiple. I even crawled through the company's facebook page thinking that if there was going to be some news coverage, they'd put it there, but could not find anything. RecycledPixels (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not seeing how this meets NORG/GNG. WP:CORPSPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.