- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- M95 Gas Mask (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
IMO this article does not meet the relevance criteria, because it is not specified why this gas mask should be on any significance or importance to have an article on it Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 00:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete exactly per nom, there's nothing to denote any significance of this product over any other. Nja247 08:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @199 · 03:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication it satisfies WP:N Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information , nor is it a directory of Finnish military gadgets. In which war did this gas mask play an important role? Edison (talk) 05:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.