- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- MDX file (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article fails to meet Wikipedia General Notability guildeline demand and hence does not merit inclusion in Wikipedia. According to article itself, MDX file is non-documented format. If it is non-documented, then what is it doing in Wikipedia? What happened to significant coverage, not to mention reliable secondary sources? Fleet Command (talk) 19:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Fleet Command (talk) 19:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this format. Joe Chill (talk) 01:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- —mono 02:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No reliable sources or significant coverage. Fridae'§Doom | Talk to me 00:12, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - For proprietary file formats, it's common that no public documentation is available; this happens in other industries as well. This does not mean the file format is rarely used, it just means it's not an open let alone free file format. - Simeon (talk) 01:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Correct. And no one here said that. The reason for which we have nominated this article for deletion is entirely different. Fleet Command (talk) 06:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.