Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MES Hybrid Document Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete via my speedy (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 16:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MES Hybrid Document Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability per WP:CORP. All sources primary, tangential, irrelevant and/or unverifiable - zero RSes about the company. Literally two hits in Google News, both tangential. They sound like the sort of company that *should* be notable, but there's no apparent evidence. David Gerard (talk) 21:02, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 21:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.